This is a web page preview of a Microsoft Word document from the West Berkshire Council Liberal Democrats site. It is generated by a computer and is not manually edited. Formatting and content may be displayed differently to the original document, and should not be regarded as definitive.


West Berkshire Council Liberal Democrats

0x01 graphic

Liberal Democrats Proposed Budget 2006/7

01/03/06

(updated to include car parking income)

Liberal Democrats will propose:

Reducing the Council Tax rise to 2.45% whilst scrapping many of the mean cuts proposed by the Conservatives.

An overall budget requirement of £172,442,000 rather than £172,720,000

Headline Details

Looking harder for savings to keep tax down

Historical Context

In control of West Berkshire Council in 2003/4, 2004/5 and 2005/6 Liberal Democrats have consistently reduced the rate of Council Tax rises, despite poor financial settlements and unfunded extra demands from the Government

Table 1 Reductions in the rise in Council Tax since the 2003 local elections (Lib Dem budget plans implemented in between 2003/4 and 2005/6)

Year

Rise %

Reduction in rise

2003/4

8.5

0

2004/5

7.9

-0.6

2005/6

3.9

-4

2006/7*

2.45*

-1.45

* = (proposed)

Invest to Save

One of the key strategies of the Liberal Democrats In control of West Berkshire Council was investing in “Invest to Save” projects, some of which have started to bear fruit. Some of the savings proposed in this years budget are as a direct result of prudent investments made in previous years.

Savings or Service Cuts?

The Liberal Democrat Group feel that some of these proposed savings run too high a risk for services.

Deleting the whole of the £90,000 budget for agency staff in Community Care and Housing in one go could have devastating effects on the services in care homes and so the Lib Dems will only accept £60k of this proposed £90k saving.

Advice from Officers has been that cutting the purchase of residential care beds to 58 could mean that waiting lists be introduced again for residential care. That is why Liberal Democrats are willing to fund 60 residential beds not the 58 beds proposed by the Conservatives.

Council's Inspection Ratings Falling

West Berkshire Council Liberal Democrats worked hard to improve this Council and its services and last year it was raised to being rated "Good", removing some of the costly government inspections.

Since the Conservatives took control the rating fell from 4/5 under the old ratings, to just 2/4 under the new ratings.

When the Liberal Democrats left office the Council was rated 4/4 for value for money use of resources - the Conservative Council is now branded by the Audit Commission as just 2/4.

Community Care & Housing

Additional Investments

Savings

The net cost of Liberal Democrat proposed investments in CC&H is £82k

Children & Young People

Savings

Total Children and Young People + £95k pressure

Strategy and Resources

Additional Investments

Savings

Net cost Strategy & Resources £40k extra investment

Environment & Public Protection

Additional Investments

Savings

Net cost Environment & Public Protection saving of £495k

Other Changes

Strategic Risk Fund

Transfer £240k of the £1.2m Strategic Risk Fund reserve to the Waste PFI reserve.

Allocate the remainder £0.96m from the Strategic Risk Fund reserve to road resurfacing works resulting in a total of £2.26m invested in Highways.

Fees & Charges - season ticket price rise in the Kennet Centre Car Park

Liberal Democrats also plan to trim back the proposed rises in Season Ticket prices in Newbury of upto 29.6% which will hit workers in the town.

This would be funded by introducing a £1 night time parking charge across Newbury with enforcement patrols. Officers have confirmed that anticipated net revenue from the night time charge would fund this reduction in the rise of season ticket prices.

This charge would be implemented as well as the planned £1 charge at the Kennet Centre multi-storey car park, which remains Council policy to help fund the proposed new cinema, in line with the continued Lib Dem commitment of bringing a cinema to Newbury.

Net additional revenue of a minimum of £14k (officer advice was that the charge could raise upto £30k net profit, but we have been prudent in our assumptions) would be used to lower the punitive rises in Season Tickets down to a maximum of 3.7%.

Description

Current Fee 2005/6

Proposed Fee Con 2006/7

Proposed Fee LD 2006/7

% Increase Con

% Increase LD

Difference % Con/LD

Season Ticket Prices

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kennet Centre

 

 

 

 

 

 

Per Quarter

135

175

140

29.6

3.7

-25.9

Northbrook MSCP

 

 

 

 

 

 

Per Quarter

135

165

140

22.2

3.7

-18.5

Per Annum

450

530

465

17.8

3.3

-14.5

 

Newbury “General”

 

 

 

 

 

 

Per Quarter

155

185

160

19.4

3.2

-16.2

Per Annum

580

680

600

17.2

3.4

-13.8

The original Environment & Public Protection fees and charges proposals are on the final page of the document, page 120 of the Council papers and page 77 of the 9th February Executive papers.


ALTERNATIVE BUDGET PROPOSALS IN DETAIL

Directorate

 

Difference

Explanation

Community Care and Housing

 

Difference

explanation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unavoidable

 

 

 

Savings

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Older People

 

 

 

Learning Disabilities

300

0

 

One extra nursing bed

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11 more intensive home care

252

0

 

Reduced staff in elderly homes

60

90

reduced from 90k to 60k - keeping a budget to enable the Council to employ agency staff

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Physical Disabilities

 

 

 

Client income

40

0

 

2 Extra nursing beds

70

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Learning disabilities

 

 

 

Community Meals

0

20

Remove this £20k cut ahead of planned scrutiny recommendations on this year

7 extra residential/nursing part year

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17 extra day care

447

0

 

Cost efficiencies

55

-30

Increased savings from Tories' £25k to £55k

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mental Health

 

 

 

Care Management Teams

70

25

reduced from £95k to £70k

1 extra residential

31

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Business Support

60

0

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

Real Extra Investment

 

 

 

Client Income

108

0

 

Age Concern Home Visiting

25

25

extend scheme

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchase of residential beds

50

12

Fund 60 beds, 2 more than the Tories' 58 - Tories proposed £62k of savings LD's propose £50k

Sub total Unavoidables CC&H

825

25

 

for older people